All comparisons
Uptriva vs Uptime Kuma · github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma

The Uptime Kuma alternative you don't have to babysit

Uptime Kuma is the beloved self-hosted monitor: free, Docker-easy, dozens of monitor types and notification providers. But you are the SRE — upgrades, backups, single point of failure, and no real multi-region story. It's also a monitor only: no managed status pages, no on-call, no incident workflows, no team seats. Uptriva gives you the internal-visibility benefit Kuma users actually want (it runs on your host) without making you run the whole control plane.

Free and open source; you pay with operational time instead of money.

Feature comparison

CapabilityUptime KumaUptriva
Runs on your own infra
Uptriva agents run on your hosts; the control plane is managed.
Monitors internal/private services
Kuma reaches whatever the host can reach; Uptriva agents add host-level detail.
Multi-region external probes
Kuma is one node — it sees the world from a single vantage point.
Host security detectors (SSH, integrity, users)
Managed service (no ops burden)
Status pages + custom domains
Kuma has basic built-in status pages on its own instance.
On-call rotations & escalation chains
Incident management
Team members, orgs & seats
Event rules → actions on hosts
Notification channels
Free

Feature and pricing information reflects each vendor's public documentation at the time of writing — verify on their site before deciding.

Where Uptime Kuma is genuinely strong

Free forever

No tiers, no limits, no account. If budget is zero and you accept running it yourself, nothing beats it.

Huge notification catalog

Dozens of providers wired in by the community — Kuma talks to almost anything.

Active open-source community

Fast-moving, widely deployed, well documented.

Why teams switch to Uptriva

Ops-free control plane

No Docker updates, no backups, no 'the monitor went down so nobody noticed'. Uptriva's managed service watches the watchers.

External + internal in one view

Multi-region probes outside, agents inside — Kuma can only ever see from wherever you installed it.

The parts Kuma doesn't have

On-call rotations, escalation chains, incident timelines, org memberships, seat management, SLA reporting, event rules that act on hosts.

Security events, not just up/down

Failed SSH logins, new listeners, file-integrity changes — signals a ping can't produce.

Migrating from Uptime Kuma

  1. 01Sign up — recreate your Kuma monitor list as Uptriva monitors (HTTP, TCP, ping, keyword all map over).
  2. 02Install agents on the hosts Kuma was installed on; internal services stay covered.
  3. 03Recreate notification channels (Discord, Slack, email, webhook) in Uptriva alert channels.
  4. 04Replace Kuma's built-in status page with an Uptriva status page on your custom domain.
  5. 05Decommission the Kuma container once Uptriva monitors report green.

FAQ

Uptime Kuma is free — why pay for Uptriva?+

Kuma costs operational time: hosting, updates, backups, and a single point of failure for your alerting. Uptriva's free tier covers small setups; paid tiers buy you zero ops plus on-call, incidents and agents.

Can Kuma monitor multiple regions?+

Not natively — one Kuma instance checks from one location. Distributed Kuma setups don't aggregate into one view.

Does Uptriva self-host like Kuma?+

No — Uptriva is a managed service with agents you install on hosts. If full self-hosting is required, Kuma stays the honest pick.

Can I get status pages from Kuma?+

Kuma has basic status pages on its own instance. Uptriva status pages support custom domains, members, seats and audit history.

See inside your infrastructure

External probes plus internal agents, status pages, on-call and event automation — free tier, no card required.